✦
✦
✦
✦
I
Manuscript Evidence
| Criterion |
The Holy Bible |
Book of Mormon |
| Earliest Manuscripts |
Dead Sea Scrolls (250 BC – AD 68): Isaiah, Psalms, Genesis; P52 papyrus (~AD 125) |
No original manuscripts — only an 1830 printed edition survives |
| Number of Copies |
25,000+ New Testament manuscripts; 1,000+ Old Testament Hebrew MSS OVERWHELMING |
Zero pre-1830 manuscripts NONE |
| Textual Stability |
99.5% stable (NT); minor variants across the manuscript tradition |
Printer's Manuscript (1830) contains 3,000+ changes from original dictation |
| Verdict |
Overwhelming |
None |
Bible wins: Physical copies from antiquity vs. zero ancient manuscripts. The manuscript tradition supporting Sacred Scripture is without parallel in the ancient world.
II
Archaeological Corroboration
| Type |
The Holy Bible |
Book of Mormon |
| Cities Confirmed |
200+: Jerusalem, Nineveh, Babylon, Lachish, Hazor, Dan, Megiddo VERIFIED |
0 cities confirmed — Zarahemla, Cumorah, etc. remain archaeologically unattested NONE |
| Inscriptions Naming People |
50+ named kings and leaders: Hezekiah's Tunnel (2 Kings 20), Mesha Stele (Moab, mentions Israel), Pontius Pilate Inscription |
0 inscriptions bearing BoM names such as Nephi, Moroni, or Laman |
| Artifacts |
Tel Dan Stele ("House of David"), Cyrus Cylinder, Lachish Letters |
No artifacts — steel swords, horses, and chariots are absent from the pre-Columbian archaeological record |
| Verdict |
Massive |
Zero direct |
Bible wins: Dozens of sites, kings, and events confirmed by independent excavation. The Book of Mormon: no confirmed locations despite claiming 1,000+ years of civilization and warfare on the American continent.
III
Linguistic & Cultural Evidence
| Criterion |
The Holy Bible |
Book of Mormon |
| Language |
Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek — all attested and extensively documented in ancient texts |
"Reformed Egyptian" — no known script; unattested in any ancient record |
| Names |
1,000+ biblical names confirmed in Egyptian, Assyrian, and Babylonian records (e.g., Shishak, Sennacherib) |
0 BoM names found in Mesoamerican, South American, or any ancient pre-Columbian records |
| Cultural Details |
Accurate: Hittites (once doubted, now confirmed); camel domestication (Genesis) |
Major anachronisms: Steel (1 Nephi 4:9, ~600 BC) absent from pre-Columbian Americas; Horses and wheat (2 Nephi 15) are post-Columbian introductions |
| Verdict |
Strong |
Problematic |
Bible wins: Names, languages, and culture match the ancient Near East across centuries of independent scholarship. The Book of Mormon presents major anachronisms per mainstream archaeology and linguistics.
IV
External Historical Corroboration
| Source |
The Holy Bible |
Book of Mormon |
| Non-Biblical Historians |
Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny, and Suetonius all mention Jesus, Pilate, and early Christians |
No external mention of Nephites, Lamanites, or any BoM event in any ancient source |
| Neighboring Cultures |
Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon independently record Israel, Judah, David, and Solomon |
Maya, Olmec, Aztec — no record of BoM civilizations in any pre-Columbian source |
| Verdict |
Multiple |
Zero |
Bible wins: Roman, Jewish, and pagan sources independently confirm key biblical events and persons. The Book of Mormon: no trace in any pre-Columbian record.
V
Internal Consistency & Geography
| Criterion |
The Holy Bible |
Book of Mormon |
| Geography |
Known and verifiable: Israel, Egypt, Babylon, Rome — all mapped and excavated |
"Narrow neck of land," "Land Northward" — location unknown; no scholarly consensus after 190 years |
| Internal Map |
Coherent distances (Jerusalem to Babylon = ~600 miles, consistent with ancient records) |
Contradictory distances: "Day and a half's journey" for the narrow neck implies 120+ miles — implausible |
| Verdict |
Clear |
Vague / Inconsistent |
Bible wins: Real-world geography, confirmed by independent archaeology. The Book of Mormon: no plausible map that coheres with known pre-Columbian archaeology has been produced.
Summary of Evidence — Historicity Scorecard
Manuscripts
25,000+
0
Archaeology
200+ cities
50+ kings
0
Inscriptions
Tel Dan, Pilate, Cyrus
0
External Sources
Josephus, Tacitus, et al.
0
Linguistic Fit
Hebrew/Greek attested
Reformed Egyptian = unknown
Anachronisms
Minor (e.g., camels)
Major (steel, horses, wheat)
Total Score
9/10
0/10
⚖
LDS Apologist Counter-Claims — Assessed
| BoM Claim |
Scholarly Assessment |
| NHM = Nahom (1 Nephi 16:34) |
Possible association, but NHM is a tribal name in Yemen — not a city. No "Nahom"-ites or contemporaneous altar have been identified matching the narrative. |
| Chiasmus (Alma 36) |
A literary structure, not historical evidence. Chiasmus appears extensively in Homer and throughout the Bible — it is not unique to an ancient Hebraic source. |
| Limited Geography Theory |
Shrinks the BoM world to a 100-mile area — but still yields no cities, no DNA correlation, and no metallurgy matching the text's claims. |
| Spiritual Witness |
Subjective religious experience is not historical or archaeological evidence, by any recognized scholarly standard. |
🏛
Scholarly Consensus
Bible: Substantial historical core confirmed (Israel, kings, exile)
BoM: No archaeological support
Bible: Hebrew/Greek texts authenticated
BoM: "Reformed Egyptian" unattested in any known script system
Bible: Jesus, Pilate, early church — historically corroborated
BoM: No pre-Columbian evidence for any BoM event or figure
Final Verdict
The Holy Bible — By an Overwhelming Margin
Sacred Scripture possesses massive, multi-sourced, physical evidence of historicity spanning manuscript tradition, archaeology, external corroboration, and linguistic integrity. The Book of Mormon has zero direct archaeological, manuscript, or external corroboration. For historicity, the Bible stands in a class entirely apart.